Title: Why Blocking Pakistani Celebrities on Indian Social Media Was a Critical Move
Introducti Today, we discuss a bold and long-awaited move taken by the Indian government: the ban on Pakistani celebrities and influencers across Indian social media platforms. From popular cricketers like Shahid Afridi and Shoaib Akhtar to actors and media personalities, their digital presence has been wiped out from the Indian internet space. This decision is not just about politics or border tensions — it’s deeply connected to national security, economics, and public sentiment.
Pakistani Influencers: Popularity Built on Indian Audiences
Despite limited internet penetration in Pakistan (around 27%), several of their celebrities had millions of followers — most of them from India. Platforms like YouTube, Twitter, and Instagram had become massive revenue sources for these individuals, courtesy of Indian views and engagement.
Shoaib Akhtar, for instance, had millions of subscribers on YouTube, and about 70–80% of his viewers were Indian. Each viral video earned him lakhs in ad revenue — a substantial portion of which went to the Pakistani government as taxes. Essentially, Indian viewers were indirectly funding a hostile state.
Shahid Afridi’s Radical Views and Controversies
The move gains further relevance when considering figures like Shahid Afridi. Known for his radical statements, Afridi has made inflammatory remarks about Kashmir, even claiming terrorists killed in India were his relatives. He has also spoken against women’s sports and shared regressive beliefs — such as smashing his TV after seeing his daughters mimic Hindu rituals from Indian shows.
Despite this, Indian celebrities like Yuvraj Singh and Harbhajan Singh once promoted his NGO. While they later apologized, the incident revealed how Pakistani figures were using their Indian goodwill for fundraising — funds that could inadvertently support extremist views.
Digital Penetration: A Stark Contrast Between India and Pakistan
India’s digital revolution, powered by initiatives like Reliance Jio, has brought over 70 crore people online (56% of the population as of 2022, likely higher now). In contrast, Pakistan has failed to provide widespread internet access. Out of its 22–23 crore population, less than 10 crore use the internet — and most of them are from Punjab province.
To run their creator economy, Pakistani influencers depended on Indian users. With India now banning them, their digital careers face an existential crisis. Many of them will lose 80–90% of their revenue — a financial blow not only to the creators but also to Pakistan’s tax system.
The Broader Impact: Crippling Pakistan’s Digital Revenue Stream
This move isn’t just symbolic — it strikes directly at the revenue that Pakistani public figures and, by extension, their government, were generating from Indian platforms. From YouTube monetization to brand deals, the digital economy had become a lifeline for many Pakistani celebrities, especially with their limited domestic audience.
Now, with their visibility in India gone, many are likely to seek foreign citizenship (as seen with Mohammad Amir applying for UK citizenship) to regain global access and relevance.
Why This Should Have Happened Sooner
Given the long history of anti-India sentiments from Pakistani public figures and the open support for extremist ideologies, this ban should arguably have been implemented much earlier. However, it still comes as a welcome correction to a previously unchecked influence.
It also reflects a broader failure of public boycott — many Indians continued to follow and fund these creators despite knowing their views. Now, with a decisive government action, that loophole has been sealed.
Conclusion
This move is not about silencing anyone — it’s about national interest, self-respect, and preventing our digital economy from fueling hostile propaganda. The Indian government’s decision sends a clear message: if you wish to malign our nation while profiting from our people, that era is now over.
Question for You
How many years has it been since the end of the Vietnam War? Is Vietnam currently celebrating the 40th, 45th, 50th, or 90th anniversary?
Comment your answer below — and the correct ones will get a heart!